These notes are raw and not post-processed. They were all taken while the workshop was going on, and hence are not polished and not guaranteed complete or necessarily even balanced -- many scribes took extensive notes on only parts of the entire discussion. |
These notes were projected on the video system and used, in part, to keep track of the discussion for those in the room. |
Morning Session Rebecca Wright Alma Whitten Replacing the Domain Name System o Distributed Searching: overlay on DNS? Availability and Anon Speech: via Freenet? o Route around DNS o Is it too late b/c of multinationals? o System must be a superset of DNS o Hierarchy? Dist DB? Goals vs means? o How to init a comp w/your context? [Biz cards?] o Deployment & wide distribution? o Bookmarks/aliases for IP addrs? Share alists? o Caches vs crowds o Chokepoints vs govt coordination o Expectations usually right vs always right common nameproblems privacy how do you know when -wrong- site? diameter dichotomy (needs experimental data!) o Attacks o Lots of glTLD's? o Land grabs vs price to grab them all? o Can we make a simple prototype to start with? o Do we need different disamb. proto's for diff. types? o Tension between the big guys and the little guys o Focus on better system, -not- current DNS politics! o Browser infrastructure lock-in vs naming o -Hundreds- of glTLD's? Can we do it? o -Findable- names vs -good- names o Ontological solutions? o Are multinationals the most important entity? o Do web YP's solve the small -co- problem now? o What is the killer app? o DNS -was- meant to be used by individuals originally o Throw away DNS and -not- replace it? :) o Search -up- and -around- in DNS, not just -down- o DNS queries don't nec. req. -static- server lookup o Even thousands of glTLD's don't solve TM issue o Can we separate tech and intprop issues? o Naming vs finding (also well-known biz vs individuals) o Solve the -naming- problem, -not- the -finding- problem! o How to concretize discussion? o Multiplicity of naming & finding systems o DNS is already being used as a -dynamic- database o The killer app might be for the ISP's, not the users o DNS as a hinting system? o How do you prevent the biggies from smashing soln? o Unique domains for each person or not? o New namespaces, e.g., Napster o In some parts of world, many people per machine o Do we have data about how users use the DNS? (and how do we get some?) o SN as a finding engine only? o How do we -change- things once we know what to do? o How do we prevent capture by the biggies? o Name freehold w/o interference to use in the appropriate context o Should/could we punt some of this back into the courts? o Separate tm and non-tm spaces? o How do we continue after the WS? o What are the new services that might start? o Ambiguity is a good thing! (also enables anon speech) o Don't combine too many things or we'll get brown o Don't conflate net and web! o Progress comes from small isolated coding groups... o How do we give incentives to unsophisticated users? o Can we use our influence w/our respective companies? o Geography may be a red herring ...but maybe it's useful after all... o Language issues! The UI is a problem... Afternoon Session David Phillips John Gilmore Business Methodology Anti-nuke activism: o Narrow focus o Social movement How do we create a cognitively-prepared and socially-resourceful populace? Possible privacy threats: intimacy, autonomy, discrimination Demographic maintenance of schisms Coalition poss: WTO, World Bank, etc; biotech Free Software: Giving SW away doesn't break your business! You can't screw up any of 1000 different things Go make some news FS reduces transaction costs of cooperation $1M compiler contracts didn't work... Cross-compilation and embedded systems worked Cross/embed 50x PC market Must minimize the barrier to entry for improvements Egalitarian control over the direction of the product Cygnus may be the only -profitable- FSW co FreeS/WAN Discussion: o What resonates w/the public? o Groups of people fall into a legal hole o Libertarian social autonomy vs coalition-building? o Chernobyl may not be appropriate analogy o Privacy implications when tech works -as designed- o Chernobyl opportunities? o Secure fn eval, blinding as tech solns o A privacy disaster causes -loss of trust in priv advocates!- o Homework: legal, interest groups, reg groups o Expectations: confidentiality, lack of surveillance o Privacy problems are highly situational (specific measures) o Biz comm helpful in defeating key escrow o It's not just biz that gains from data mining! People get a lot, too, 'cause biz pays them off o What are the biz models in which there is an inherent incentive to build in and profit from trust? o What might a Chernobyl get us? o 30+ privacy bills in Calif, but often not well thought out o How do we get biz to think about privacy at design stage? o Tort law? o Theories of economics: liability, labor, price o Feature creep -> privacy disaster... (ontological assumps) o There are other legis models than EU: think NZ! o Biz motivators: fear, greed o Privacy is not just an Internet problem o Privacy problem 'cause you can't move money on the net o A fair question can motivate biz (PIII SN) Afternoon Session Deirdre Mulligan Cash discussion: _Toxic Sludge is Good For You_ o SpendCash: but clearing is a problem o Netherlands: barcoded cash o Prepaid cellular cards outside US can help leverage the distribution of plain prepaid cash cards---but must move fast before credit cards eat this! o Critical mass (where's the knee in the curve?) Payment systems should interoperate PayPal: > 250K active users (eBay drove this) o Prepaid cards are too heavily regulated to escape from severe govt interference o CC history: _The Credit Card Catastrophe_ (Matty Simmons) o Demand side: anonymity (your favorite sins) o Economics o We routinely engage in anon transactions (buying a paper) o "Cash through the mail" analogies o CC vs DC liability differences o Prepaid card float is good for card vendor o Anonymity? Liability? o Who underwrites? What are their motivations? (French Telecarte system and lack of anonymity) o The headache of CC fraud for -merchants- ...but merchant misuse is the dominant fraud! o RocketCash (mostly for teenagers)---take cash from all over o Will float tighten up? o Disincentives: float, incentive programs, [3% charges...] o ICanBuy.com o Porn vs -lack- of anon -> proof of adulthood o Calling pattern-matching vs supposed anonymity o Can we use CC infrastructure as a scaffold for cash? Anon CC's at -any- price? Bootstrapping via market? o -Any- system can bootstrap the whole thing! o Are we talking about cash on the net, or just replacing or augmenting CC's w/an anon system irrespective of net? o Merchants are hypersensitive about CC chargebacks, rates... o Many CC's want to do the right thing: Visa doesn't data mine, but their member banks -do- o Dealing w/govt interference makes CC's eager to -not- know where the money's going! o It's the clearing system that we have to pay attention to o Individually noncontestable payments (for when you want the anonymity)---an incremental approach! o Smartcard interoperability still a big problem o Prepaid cards might expand the informal economy o pcix.org (fora for tech discussions, consumers, govt, ...) going up this week (permission tracker, owned by followup.net) o cash is a fundamentally social construction o Privacy International, EPIC, EFF, CDT, CPSR, ... o Pierce (clearinghouse) in Dublin o We have no marketing/demographics/advertising people here! o _Blown to Bits_, p.167: "Privacy is the Achilles heel of ecommerce." o Simultaneous needs for autonomy and community o We don't need another Chernobyl---we need another Silent Spring
Lenny Foner Last modified: Sun Apr 23 15:54:35 EDT 2000